Tag Archives: Abraham

Genesis 22: Abraham and Isaac

Another story that seems horrific. All sorts of questions arise, how does God even ask such a thing? How can Abraham even contemplate such an act? What might God ask of us? 

Bruggemann suggests that our understanding of God is as a tester at the beginning of the text and as a provider at the end, is the frame within which we must read this story. Earlier theologians also struggled, “Calvin says. ‘The command and promise of God are in conflict.’ Luther says, This is a ‘contradiction with which God contradicts himself.”

v1 “Some time later” – Isaac is old enough to carry the wood, and to know what constitutes a sacrifice. 

v2 Ishmael has been forgotten, “only son” 

relationship is recognised “who you love”

v3 Abraham had argued for the lives of the people in Sodom – but here he obeys without any argument. Is this faith or blind obedience?

“God is shown to be freely sovereign just as he is graciously faithful. That God provides shows his gracious faithfulness. That God tests is a disclosure of his free sovereignty.”

v5-9 Is Abraham carrying out God’s orders but excepting intervention? The narrator does not let us in on Abraham’s emotions, just tell us what is happening – the emotion is for the reader to imagine.

v10 Parallels with Job? “Like Job, Abraham is prepared to trust fully the God who gives and who takes away (cf Job 1:21).

“Neither the Joban poetry nor this Abraham story are about evil or the justice of God. Rather, they ask about faith which as Kierkegaard has shown, drives us to dread before the self is yielded to God.”

“It is evident in Exodus 20:20, Deuteronomy 8:16, 13:3,33:8 that testing is a common theme for a time of syncretism, like the Ahab-Jezebel period (cf 1 Kings 17-19). The term testing (nasah) is prominent in Deuteronomy, which faced syncretism most directly. The testing of Israel by God is to determine if Israel will trust only Yahweh or if it would look at the same time to other gods.”

v 11-14 God provides. “To assert that God provides requires a faith as intense as the conviction that God tests… In a world beset by humanism, scientism, and naturalism, the claim that God alone provides is as scandalous as the claim that he tests.” 

“Abraham’s obedience, though difficult to understand at times, is active not passive. He accepts and he responds. He does not initiate because it is God’s plan that is unfolding, not his. If that plan is to be brought to completion, and if Abraham is to play any part in it, he will have to accept the role into which he has been cast and trust the one whose story is being told – and that one is God.” Dianne Berget

v15-19 Promise repeated.

v20-24 a family tree – and Rebekah is introduced. More on her next time.

Genesis 18 & 19: Sodom

Abraham: Friend of God James 2:23

As God’s two companions head towards Sodom, so Abraham and Yahweh stand on the hillside discussing theological ethics.

v23 Abraham asks, “Will you indeed sweep away the righteous with the wicked? and we are forced to ask “Is this a God of judgement and retribution or a God of mercy and grace?”

Abraham’s role is the look for the well-being of all humanity. The chosenness (known) of Abraham to be “doing righteousness and justice”  cf Isaiah 5:7, Amos 5:7, 24; 6:12; Jeremiah 23:5, 33:15

“Abraham calls into question the sense of humanity operative in the sinful city and on the part of Yahweh. Yahweh’s sense of humanity is no more acceptable to Abraham than is the practice of Sodom.” Bruggemann p 169

“Besides being individuals in their own right, people are also members of corporate bodies. They share in and contribute to a corporate identity. … they enjoy the common benefits of the group and they carry corporate responsibilities.”Bergant p75

v25 Far be it from you to do such a thing, to slay the righteous with the wicked, so that the righteous fare as the wicked! Far be that from you! Shall not the Judge of all the earth do what is just?” Abraham haggles with God. Is that what our prayers of intercession are to do?

God is now more attentive to and more moved by those who obey than those who do not. Such an argument questions every caricature of God as the score-keeper and guardian of morality who is ready to pounce and judge and punish. No, God is more ready to celebrate, acknowledge , and credit for all the right-relatedness of a few. 

cf Hosea 11:8-9, Isa 53:5,10, Matt 5:43-48, Rom 3:21-26, Eph 2:14-16

God is not an indifferent or tyrannical distributor of rewards or punishments. Rather, God actively seeks a way out of death for us all. 

Genesis 19

So we reach Sodom, Is this an an old-fashioned story of retribution?  The opportunity for some fire & brimstone teaching?

v1-2 Hospitality

v3 protection

v4 the sin of Sodom is gang-rape

v6 Lot bargains for honour of his guests – although his alternative is no less shocking.

v8 Cf Judges 19 

v9 Another sin of Sodom is xenophobia

v10 Angels react and prepare to save Lot and his family

v12 son-in-law

v16 hesitation

v19 bargaining!

v20 escape

v24 retribution

v26 Lot’s wife – looking back

v29 The remembering of Abraham here is as crucial here as the remembering of Noah in 8:1. This narrator does not permit even remembering Abraham to make a difference to the total narrative. Abraham’s impact is limited to Lot. In that respect the impact of Abraham is less than that if Noah in the parallel narrative. This narrative still waits for a “better” gospel. WB p167