Tag Archives: Hagar

Genesis 21: Sarah & Hagar

We skipped past Genesis 20 where once again Abraham passes off Sarah as his sister and we then learn that they are in fact half-siblings, with a shared father and different mothers! But lets carry on with the bigger story – finally a son is born …

Genesis 21

v1 Children are the gift of God. God’s promise is fulfilled. The narrative continues in a patriarchal manner – “Sarah … bore Abraham a son.”

v3-7 Isaac is named – for laughter. 

“While Abraham and Sarah’s previous laughter was engendered by incredulity, however, this laughter springs from joy. Isaac not only reminds his parents of their lack of faith in the face of of the ridiculousness of a possible pregnancy at such an advanced age but also is the source of their joy. the advanced age of the couple is a constant reminder of the marvels that God can and does work to accomplish divine promise.” Trible p44

v8-9 laughter becomes the problem. “Sarah saw the son of Hagar, the Egyptian, whom she had borne to Abraham, laughing.” Is this happiness? mocking? threat? status? v6 laugh at? Isaacing? It doesn’t matter Sarah perceives a threat and in asserts power within patriarchal limits. – “her son”, “my son” – possession, intimacy, exclusivity, attachment, 

v11-12 “his Son, Ishmael” non-exclusive, non-intimate, “the lad.” Not named – distancing, God sides and names Sarah & Isaac. Sarah, “the princess” is secure within the patriarchy – “hear her voice.”

“For God to put Sarah on the pedestal saves her from a threat but nonetheless deprives her of healing and freedom. And it damages those whose she encounters.” Trible

“cast out” – Eden, Exodus, Exile.

v14 “send away”, first slave to be freed, first wife to be divorced. When pharaoh sent A/S away from Egypt, they left wealthy. “Hagar leaves Abraham’s house with Ishmael, and eager nourishment, she departs a poor woman of non stature. In these two stories, the verb “send away” reverberates with dissonance.”

From Abraham’s great wealth – Hagar and Ishmael are given meagre resources to survive in the desert. In contrast “the disobedient couple stay in the “garden”, while the “fruits” of their unfaithfulness are expelled. Within the “garden”, Sarah and Abraham, claims life with Isaac; outside in the wilderness, Hagar and “the child” face death. For certain the design of God do not conform to the logic of justice.”

v15 “cast” better translated “put” as in “lays a body in a grave”. The child is dying, she prepares him and she prepares herself. – distancing, helplessness, loneliness, “she becomes the mother of all weepers. Yet she does not cry out to God. Instead, her voice sounds and resounds in the desolate wilderness of exile and despair. A madonna alone, she laments the approaching death of her only child.”

v17 God hears “the lad.” God’s messenger speaks to Hagar – “Do not be afraid,…”  The promise Hagar was given at Sher, now shifts to the “the lad,” Hagar continues to live under Patriarchy  – but now the Patriarch is her son.

v19 God opens her eyes, she sees the well, physical restoration begins

v 20 The wilderness becomes home to Ishmael, he learns to live in and to thrive. 

v21 Hagar’s last action, “”Hagar redirects the divine promise her way.In finding  for Ishmael an Egyptian wife, she seeks for herself a future that God has diminished. For the last time Hagar appears in the Hebrew Bible, and for the first time she is called “mother.”

The story of Hagar, Sarah, and their children is a story of struggle – struggle with each other and against patriarchal oppression. As we study the story and the trajectory of its interpretation through history and into the twenty-first century, we sees the seeds of conflict and struggle we have inherited. the question for us now seems to be : How can we get women and their children back together? Is there anyway to overcome the hidden and not so hidden injuries of class, race, gender, economics and politics that use our faith traditions to excuse continuing conflict? (Russell p185)

“As Muslims, Jews and Christians we are all children of struggle even to the thousandth generation. One discovery we can make as we reflect together on the enmity between Hagah and Sarah is that the struggle between us will not cease unless we become children who struggle for the wider gift of God’s justice, peace, and wholeness in our lives and the whole creation. (Russell, p 197)

Hagar: genesis 16

16:1 Sarai as First Wife: “The inability bear children was a grave hardship for any woman in a patriarchal society, since the survival of the clan or tribe depended on the expansion of individual families. It was a particular affliction  or the wife of the patriarch , for it was her responsibility to provide the next leader of the group. Thus, Sarai’s barrenness was both a personal affliction and a condition that jeopardised the entire group. Dianne Bergant “Genesis: From the Beginning”

Sarai blames YHWH & looks to fix the situation  – surrogacy

16:1 Hagar: – alien – slave

“Female slaves were often given as marriage gifts by the family of the bride. Such slaves belonged to the wives and could not automatically be taken as concubines by the husbands.”

“As a slave, she has no power to make decisions about her own life. Without being asked she is given to the patriarch in order to produce a child that will not even be considered hers. the child will be adopted without her consent. She is raised in status from slave to concubine not because of any merit on her part, but because of the child whose she will bear.” Dianne Bergant “Genesis: From the Beginning”

16:3 This language promotes tension between Hagar as maid and Hagar as wife and between Sarai as wide and Hagar as second wife. The vocabulary also recalls the story of the garden. The primal woman “took” the forbidden fruit, ate it, and “gave” it to her man (Gen 3:6) Hagar becomes in effect the forbidden fruit. Like the primal man. Abram eats what is offered without question or objection.”  Phyliss Trible, “Hagar, Sarah & Their Children”

16:5 The pressures of polygamy

16:6 Hagar’s return to slavery – and then acts for herself. 

16:7 Hagar is named, recognised, spoken to directly

16:8 status is recognised – instructions given – a promise received

“Hagar is not frightened but enters immediately into a very candid conversation with this mysterious visitor. Previously, when God confronted Adamwith the question , “Where are you?” (3:9) and cain with the question “What have you done?” (4:10) both men tried to avoid a direct answer. when hagar is asked . “Where have you come from and where are you going?” she provided straightforward answers.” Dianne Bergant “Genesis: From the Beginning”

16:13 [Hagar] names the Lord who sees. “The narrator introduces her words with a striking expression that accords her a power attributed to no one else in the Bible. Hagar ‘calls the name of the Lord who spoke to her” She does not invoke the Lord, she names the Lord. She calls the name, she does not call upon the name. “You are El-roi” [God of seeing] she says. …. Hagar the theologian sees God and lives. Uniting the God who sees and the God who is seen. Hagar’s insights move from life under affliction to life after theophany. Finally they conclude the divine-human encounter in the wilderness.  Phyliss Trible, “Hagar, Sarah & Their Children”

From the beginning, Hagar is powerless because God supports Sarah. Kept in her place, the slave woman is the innocent victim of use, abuse and rejection. As a symbol of the oppressed, Hagar becomes many things to many people. Most especially, all sorts of rejected women find their stories in her. She is the faithful maid exploited, the black woman used by the male and abused by the female of the ruling class, the surrogate mother, the resident alien without legal recourse, the other woman, the runaway youth, the religious fleeing from affliction, the pregnant young woman alone, the expelled wife, the divorced mother with child, the shopping bag lady carrying bread and water, the homeless woman, the indigent relying upon handouts from the power structures, the welfare mother, and the self-effacing female whose own identity shrinks in service to other. Phyllis Trible, Texts of Terror: Literary-feminist Readings of Biblical Narratives. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1984. p. 28

Hagar is a pivotal figure in biblical theology. She is the first person in scripture whom a divine messenger visits and the only person who dares to name the deity. Within the historical memories of Israel, she is the first woman to bear a child. This conception and birth make her an extraordinary figure in the story of faith: the first woman to hear an annunciation, the only one to receive a divine promise of descendants, and the first to weep for her dying child. Truly, Hagar the Egyptian is the prototype of not only special but all mothers in Israel. Phyllis Trible, Texts of Terror: Literary-feminist Readings of Biblical Narratives. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1984. p. 28